2/21/17... Reviews
are to books what “Consumer Reports” is to electronics. A book can live or die by review buzz—whether
written or by word of mouth. Reviews are
important for new releases, especially important for debut authors. Authors
understand this; readers not so much.
With my debut novel, The Accidental Wife, I didn’t know about marketing early for
pre-orders or even that an ARC was an “Advanced Review Copy.” Blogging, tweeting, street teams and book
tours were foreign terms and interviews were something you did only when asked—after your success was validated. Trolling for
reviews and endorsements was something extroverts did, and swapping reviews was
almost as uncomfortable as paying for them. It took a year of discovery and
networking with other authors to learn the truth.
Could I trust
them to be impartial? Hubby—not so much.
More to lose there, according to his
POV (point of view). Also, his left brain talent at IBM
had him editing technical manuals; He
never even read a time-travel historical romance, though he does love history and suspense and epic storylines in movies. Plus, he is great at editing grammatical
errors and relentlessly honest in the
larger picture.
My old colleague labeled
me a “helluva writer” and admitted she laughed and cried while reading The Accidental Wife. Known for her
encyclopedic mind and creative fantasy, she had poems and two published books of her own:
Minnesota Trivia and Growing Wings. It had been years since
we touched base after she moved to another state, but I trusted Laurel Winter and
loved the review she offered.
I warmed up to inviting
others to read and review IF they
liked the book, but I hesitated to ask other family members to even read it. Particularly my 80 year old stepmom and my daughters,
as I worried about their reaction to the sex scenes WildRose Press rated
“spicy.” All were fine with the sex, but my stepmom said she did not believe in time travel. Still, she got a print copy accepted in her local
library in Wisconsin. Nepotism has a silver lining!
Though my short stories
and articles were published for decades, many people knew me only as a horse
trainer. Discovery and Acceptance precede sales which precede reviews. Fishing
for reviews for a novel was going to be hard for a new “minnow” suddenly
swimming in an ocean of writers all hoping to hook readers. Harder still for a technophobe inept
at posting in Facebook and new to Twitter, Goodreads, and other social media
apps and opportunities.
Whichever way a
copy found a new reader, I couldn’t count on an instant review. Busy people took longer to read and when I
ginned up the courage to ASK for a
review, I sometimes got an intimidated deer in the headlights response: “You want ME to write a review?” Some readers felt unqualified to write one,
some didn’t know where to post or how to navigate online. Eventually, I plugged little cards into all
the print copies I sold, explaining the importance of reviews and listing the link
sites. I even sent a “click list” to one reader who told me her grandchildren might be able to show her how to add a
review on Amazon.
There are three
other review sources, aside from betas, family and friends:
1. Unsolicited
reviews, also termed “organic.”
2. Paid Reviews.
3. Swapped Reviews.
2. Paid Reviews.
3. Swapped Reviews.
Every writer is
happy to collect unsolicited reviews,
especially if they are three to five stars. Paid
reviews vary in cost and value, along with results. The WildRose Press publisher
warns against them.
If time is money,
swapping reviews also has a cost
factor beyond the fact that Amazon and other sites frown on them. I thought swapping was an inexpensive way to add reviews, even though I
read as deliberately as I write. My editing
eye zeroes in on errors, and faulty research. Knowing first-hand how much work the writer invests,
however, I always find something affirming, and try to suppress the niggling
dishonesty that gives four or five stars to a review that merits less. Isn’t it
tacitly understood that getting five stars means giving the same in a swap? Wouldn’t
it be less of a head game if we gave a STARLESS critique? It might increase the number of reviews with no risk to
writer or reviewer, especially if they share a connection!
Recently, I was
asked by a fan to endorse her friend’s fiction Indie book for her cover. This helps to
sell the book if the endorsement normally comes from a successful writer or celebrity. I
was flattered into reluctantly agreeing, telling myself this was only to save a
fan. It turned out the Indie’s first 67 pages were an info dump. Dialog was
stilted, with hundreds of he said/she said dialog tags, even with two people conversing. Supporting characters were more
sympathetic than the main characters, and the ending drifted. I affirmed that she had an editor, and asked
her if she truly wanted MY honest
opinion. Her editor also worked with Bob Woodward of the Washington Post and since Watergate, Bob has written eighteen non-fiction books. Okaaay. I emailed my notes anyway-- probably with too many suggestions. For three days of work, I received NO RESPONSE back. File that under "valuable lessons learned"--on many levels.
Endorsements and
good reviews aside, ultimate best sellers—even those by well-known beloved
writers seldom hit the mark with everyone. If you are counting reviews, even bad
ones can be a plus. Think about the Fifty Shades Trilogy by E.L. James, which hauled
in more than 60,000 reviews over the last six years Over 30% of them earmed 1 to 3 stars, with even the five star reviews holding some objection. Lower ratings usually indicate disregard for subject matter or writing skill. But Fifty Shades got people talking, saved a publishing house and planted erotic books firmly into the mainstream. True then, some best sellers are the gift of public curiosity—niche readers who take a chance on a book outside their favorite genre because it has an intriguing hook and a lot of buzz? Refute the idea that only good reviews pay off. Mixed reviews mean a broader reader base penning those cherished unsolicited reviews.
With The
Accidental Stranger—the new sequel to my debut book—I’m working the
review game smarter, investing more marketing time...and money while still conceding that
reviews come easier to veteran writers with devoted fans and a broad base that may take years to cultivate. Unless, of course, I come up with a novel hook that flutters through demographics like a contagious flu.
Another fantasy is accumulating even 1,000 reviews!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for commenting,
CJ